http://www.sltrib.com/ci_12317033 Kirby: Did we Mormons baptize your deceased loved one? I can help | ||
By Robert Kirby Tribune Columnist Salt Lake Tribune | ||
Updated:05/07/2009 03:35:12 PM MDT | ||
| ||
With the revelation that President Barack Obama's mama may now be a Mormon, the LDS practice of baptism for the dead is once again in the news. Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized by proxy recently in an LDS temple. Mormons believe Dunham would need this ordinance when she got to the other side. Obama hasn't commented on the matter. According to my double secret source inside the White House, he might have said, "If I didn't care what Mormons thought when I was running for president, why would I care now?" Mormons tend to see baptism for the dead as a personal favor rather than spiritual conscription. It's not as if you have to accept it. This life or the next, you're perfectly within your right to shout obscenities at us and slam the door. But baptism for the dead makes a whole lot more sense than the afterlife plan some faiths have, which is that you go straight to hell if you didn't see it their way before you died. At least with Mormons there's a second chance. And if we end up being right, you just might be grateful for that baptism. What's that? You'd sooner go to hell than become Mormon? OK, but hell isn't very pleasant. I've got a hundred bucks that says an eternity of sponge-bathing Hitler will change your mind. This assumes, of course, that Mormons are in charge on the other side. Frankly, even though I'm Mormon, I don't think we will be. I believe God will be in charge -- and that we're all of us (you included) in for a big fat surprise. On the other hand, it's easy to see how some people don't like the idea of Mormons giving their dearly departed an ecclesiastical makeover. In the wake of angry protests, the church has reiterated its stance that only the deceased relatives of living Mormons should be baptized by proxy. But what about those baptisms for the dead we've already performed? After all, you can't simply unbaptize someone, right? Actually, that's not exactly true. If you're upset that Grandpa may have become Mormon on the other side, I can help. It's called Excommunication for the Dead. I thought it up several years ago but got into trademark trouble with the church. They're not interested in it anymore, so I'm back in business. Here's how it works: For an appropriate consideration, I can get your ancestor's baptism for the dead thrown out. It won't be free, though. There's serious effort involved. For $250, I'm willing to commit some horrible proxy sin on behalf of your ancestor that will get him (or her) excommunicated from the LDS Church. For example, I specialize in lusting in my heart. It says right in the Bible that gazing upon a woman with lust in your heart is the same thing as committing the actual act. This is a huge ecclesiastical loophole, people. NOTE: My wife and Jennifer Aniston don't think lusting in my heart is the same thing as the actual deed, but we're talking about what the Lord thinks. Send me Grandpa's name, a certified check and the woman you want the proxy sin committed with, and I'll get right to work. I'm a professional, so it won't take longer than the average church meeting. If it's Grandma, I can still help. I commit murder in my heart every time I drive to work. It's easy. By the time I get to The Tribune , she'll be a mass murderer and no longer a candidate for becoming Mormon. For your money, you'll receive an attractive certificate of proxy excommunication worthy of framing. Simply present the certificate to whoever is in charge on the other side. Unless it's the Mormons. If that's the case, then we're both in a lot of trouble. |
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_12372124
By Robert Kirby
Tribune Columnist
Updated: 05/16/2009 04:26:08 PM MDT
If I can believe all the "check is in the mail" response I got to last week's column offering excommunication for the dead for those who are unhappy that Mormons baptized their dead relatives, I am well on my way to becoming a millionaire.
E-mail orders poured in from people anxious to ensure that their ancestors didn't become the Mormon undead through proxy baptism.
My grandfather's name is Ed. Please commit adultery in your heart for him with Dolly Parton.
Sweet. I want a franchise when you're up and running. What about stock?
You got competition, dude. I'll do the same thing for a hundred bucks.
Wow. Who knew there was so much money to be made in undoing the service of the Lord?
But my favorite responses were from the peeved; those who insisted their ancestors would never become Mormons because they had all been staunch [pick one] while alive.
Reader: "What Mormons are doing is an insult to my ancestors. My people have always been Catholic."
Her ancestors [hollering from the other side]: "No we haven't. We were pagans until the %*$&@ Romans came."
Say what you want about missionaries, the greatest conversion tool in the history of the world has been the sword. Baptism for the Dead is nothing compared to Baptism or Be Dead.
As nice as it is to think about freedom of choice in religion, we're all trickle-down products of some sort of "forced" religion.
Most people who have a particular faith got at least a semblance of it from their parents, who got it from their ancestors, who got it from whatever culture overran and dominated theirs. Those who didn't convert at the point of a sword did so through gradual assimilation and social pressure.
Islam and Christianity are the two biggest culprits. Simple benevolence isn't what made them the largest two religions on the planet today. They spread their faith through conquest and then enforcement.
Most Latinos and American Indians wouldn't be Christian today had it not been forced on them. And not only would most blacks in America not be Christian, they wouldn't even be in America.
The same is true of me. My ancestors converted to Mormonism from Anglicanism in merry old England. Before that, we were Catholic (if we knew what was good for us), and before that we probably painted ourselves blue and danced naked around a maypole.
Not only do people change religions, the religions themselves change. More than 150 years later, I'm still Mormon, but it would probably drive my great-grandfather nuts that I only have one wife and I don't live on a collective. What he believed in back then isn't even on the program today.
Go back far enough and your ancestors would be shaking their heads at what you became. All that faith and tradition and you didn't turn out anything like you were supposed to. Here's the kicker: Neither will your descendants.
No comments:
Post a Comment